Re: LIMIT NULL

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Svenne Krap <svenne(at)krap(dot)dk>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: LIMIT NULL
Date: 2009-02-07 21:35:07
Message-ID: 82C53974-125F-4CBB-AA1F-28E8A402DE1B@kineticode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Feb 7, 2009, at 12:11 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:

>> can we just apply this one and let this discussion off?
>> or maybe remove the OFFSET part and point to the SQL COMMAND
>> references page? (doesn't seem appropiate to me to reject the LIMIT
>> comment and let the other one in there while they are almost the
>> same)
>
> Patch attached and applied.

Thanks Bruce.

Best,

David

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2009-02-07 21:38:06 Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch
Previous Message Grzegorz Jaskiewicz 2009-02-07 21:11:24 Re: Is a plan for lmza commpression in pg_dump