| From: | Joshua Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: "stored procedures" |
| Date: | 2011-04-22 16:45:07 |
| Message-ID: | 828069661.182512.1303490707699.JavaMail.root@mail-1.01.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom,
> >> I'd like a pony, too. Let's be perfectly clear about this: there is
> >> no
> >> part of plpgsql that can run outside a transaction today, and
> >> probably
> >> no part of the other PLs either, and changing that "without major
> >> changes" is wishful thinking of the first order.
I always thought that it was pretty clear that autonomous transactions were a major feature, and very difficult to implement. Otherwise we'd have done SPs back in 7.4 when we first had this discussion.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
San Francisco
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Merlin Moncure | 2011-04-22 16:49:24 | Re: "stored procedures" |
| Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2011-04-22 16:30:51 | Re: best way to test new index? |