Re: btree_gist, gint4_union

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Itai Zukerman <zukerman(at)math-hat(dot)com>, pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: btree_gist, gint4_union
Date: 2003-03-17 20:50:32
Message-ID: 8269.1047934232@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> I am confused by your question. It seems it is declared as returning an
> int.

I suspect that all of the GiST union methods should be declared to
return 'internal', but Oleg or Teodor would probably know better.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-03-17 20:51:55 Re: upcasting multiplication in a query
Previous Message dev 2003-03-17 20:35:06 Re: upcasting multiplication in a query