Re: BUG #4340: SECURITY: Is SSL Doing Anything?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Dan Kaminsky <dan(at)doxpara(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #4340: SECURITY: Is SSL Doing Anything?
Date: 2008-08-18 23:36:43
Message-ID: 8268.1219102603@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Er, we don't *have* a verify_peer callback.
>>
>> Uh, the user reported running Postgres 7.3 and we have improved SSL
>> quite a bit since then so perhaps an upgrade and reading the current
>> docs would help the user.

> The code is identical in HEAD, according to a quick read I did last
> week.

Actually, I had missed that the OP was looking at 7.3 rather than 8.3.
There was a "verify_peer()" in 7.3 but it was #ifdef'd out. The
question remains whether there's a reason to have it. It would be good
if the discussion were based on a non-obsolete PG version ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gregory Stark 2008-08-19 09:34:46 Re: BUG #4340: SECURITY: Is SSL Doing Anything?
Previous Message Dan Boeriu 2008-08-18 22:48:21 BUG #4363: ts_query bug