Re: hstore improvements?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: hstore improvements?
Date: 2009-03-14 19:50:51
Message-ID: 8263.1237060251@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> As an hstore user, I'd be fine with simply limiting it to 64K (or, heck,
> 8K) and throwing an error. I'd also be fine with limiting keys to 255
> bytes, although we'd have to warn people.

Yeah, 255 might well be more of a problem than the other limit. We
could move to something like 10/22 or 12/20 split, which would give
us 1KB/4MB or 4KB/1MB limits.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-03-14 20:04:36 Re: Should SET ROLE inherit config params?
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2009-03-14 18:34:24 Re: parallel restore item dependencies