From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | cjwhite(at)cisco(dot)com |
Cc: | pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Problems with Large Objects using Postgres 7.2.1 |
Date: | 2003-04-09 16:51:01 |
Message-ID: | 8263.1049907061@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-jdbc |
"Chris White" <cjwhite(at)cisco(dot)com> writes:
> What I am seeing is that when all 8 threads are running and the system is
> shutdown, large objects committed in transactions near to the shutdown are
> corrupt when the database is restarted. I know the large objects are
> committed, because the associated entries in the tables which point to the
> large objects are present after the restart with valid information about the
> large object length and oid. However when I access the large objects I am
> only returned a 2K chunk even though the table entry tells me the entry
> should be 320K.
Hmm. Have you tried looking directly into pg_largeobject to see what
row(s) are present for the particular LO ID? Is the data that's there
valid?
> Anybody have any ideas what is the problem? Are there any know issues with
> the recovery of large objects?
No, news to me. I would suggest that you should be running 7.2.4, not
7.2.1; we don't make dot-releases just to keep busy. But offhand I
don't know of any recent reports of symptoms like this.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Chris White | 2003-04-09 17:04:09 | Re: Problems with Large Objects using Postgres 7.2.1 |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-04-09 16:34:15 | Re: SignalChildren: sending signal 12 |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pedro Salazar | 2003-04-09 16:52:21 | Re: Callable Statements |
Previous Message | Chris White | 2003-04-09 16:25:35 | Re: Problems with Large Objects using Postgres 7.2.1 |