From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
Cc: | Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, eric(dot)mutta(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Should 'sum(mvf)' read 'sum(mcv)'...? |
Date: | 2023-04-12 12:14:38 |
Message-ID: | 826011.1681301678@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> writes:
> I was inclined to spell it out as mcv_frequencies but we use xxx_freqs
> elsewhere on the same page so keeping it consistent seems better. The attached
> does this as well as adding mcf/mcv as acronyms as previously mentioned (since
> they are both tagged as <acronym>).
mcv_freqs looks good. I'd write the glossary entries as singular
(Most Common Frequency, Most Common Value) since our typical usage
is to pluralize them at the point of use ("MCVs"). Also, just
expanding the acronym doesn't seem that helpful. Maybe more like
MCF
Most Common Frequency, that is the frequency associated
with some Most Common Value
MCV
Most Common Value, one of the values appearing most often
within a particular table column
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2023-04-12 14:22:21 | Re: Should 'sum(mvf)' read 'sum(mcv)'...? |
Previous Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2023-04-12 11:14:31 | Re: Should 'sum(mvf)' read 'sum(mcv)'...? |