| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Yugo NAGATA <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: RLS makes COPY TO process child tables |
| Date: | 2023-03-10 16:34:02 |
| Message-ID: | 825494.1678466042@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
>> Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> Yugo NAGATA <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
>>>> I think this is a bug because the current behaviour is different from
>>>> the documentation.
>>> I agree, it shouldn't do that.
> Yeah, I agree based on what the COPY table TO docs say should be
> happening.
Yeah, the documentation is quite clear that child data is not included.
> I'm not sure if this makes good sense to back-patch.
I think we have to. The alternative is to back-patch some very confusing
documentation changes saying "never mind all that if RLS is on".
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Chris Travers | 2023-03-10 17:16:40 | Re: POC: Lock updated tuples in tuple_update() and tuple_delete() |
| Previous Message | Jeff Davis | 2023-03-10 15:48:13 | Re: pgsql: Use ICU by default at initdb time. |