| From: | Florian Weimer <fweimer(at)bfk(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] wal_checksum = on (default) | off |
| Date: | 2007-01-04 16:58:51 |
| Message-ID: | 824pr620fo.fsf@mid.bfk.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
* Simon Riggs:
>> Surely not. Otherwise even the "on" setting is not really a defense.
>
> Only when the CRC is exactly zero, which happens very very rarely.
Have you tried switching to Adler32 instead of CRC32?
--
Florian Weimer <fweimer(at)bfk(dot)de>
BFK edv-consulting GmbH http://www.bfk.de/
Kriegsstraße 100 tel: +49-721-96201-1
D-76133 Karlsruhe fax: +49-721-96201-99
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2007-01-04 17:05:04 | Re: [HACKERS] wal_checksum = on (default) | off |
| Previous Message | markwkm | 2007-01-04 16:55:17 | Re: 8.3 pending patch queue |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2007-01-04 17:05:04 | Re: [HACKERS] wal_checksum = on (default) | off |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2007-01-04 16:51:50 | Re: [HACKERS] wal_checksum = on (default) | off |