Re: PostgreSQL 8.2 (from CVS devel) first impressions

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: mark(at)mark(dot)mielke(dot)cc
Cc: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 8.2 (from CVS devel) first impressions
Date: 2006-11-11 01:17:09
Message-ID: 8238.1163207829@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

mark(at)mark(dot)mielke(dot)cc writes:
> On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 11:01:40AM -0500, Neil Conway wrote:
>> Presumably those are just the standard warnings we can't easiy
>> eliminate. If not, can you post them please?

> They all appear harmless.

The reason those "uninitialized variable" warnings got away from us is
that gcc doesn't emit them at -O2 or below, so most of us never saw 'em
before. I've cleaned them up.

The "find_rule" gripe is really a flex bug :-( ... not easy to avoid.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message mark 2006-11-11 01:54:38 Re: PostgreSQL 8.2 (from CVS devel) first impressions
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-11-11 00:34:09 Re: PostgreSQL 8.2 (from CVS devel) first impressions