Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bill Studenmund <wrstuden(at)netbsd(dot)org>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at>, Fernando Nasser <fnasser(at)redhat(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects
Date: 2002-01-26 00:04:15
Message-ID: 8233.1012003455@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bill Studenmund <wrstuden(at)netbsd(dot)org> writes:
> But we will have the ability to set the path per schema.

?? I don't follow that at all. A namespace is something that's referred
to by a search path, not vice versa. Or are you defining "schema" to
mean some higher-level concept that incorporates a search path of
multiple primitive namespaces? Maybe that could work, but I'm not sure
I see the point yet.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Don Baccus 2002-01-26 00:19:35 Re: contrib/tree
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-01-25 23:57:50 Re: Savepoints