From: | "Henry" <henry(at)zen(dot)co(dot)za> |
---|---|
To: | "Craig Ringer" <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Oracle and Postgresql |
Date: | 2008-09-01 07:51:14 |
Message-ID: | 821d629e1f6f81a8452d2deec31b31a6.squirrel@zenmail.co.za |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-www |
On Mon, September 1, 2008 4:09 am, Craig Ringer wrote:
> Right now, PostgreSQL has network-based master-to-slave(s) clustering
> using Slony that permits slaves to operate online read-only as reporting
> servers etc. It also covers failover with the use of an external
> heartbeat/STONITH setup. However, it's not completely transparent to the
> application and it's not seen as "part of postgresql".
>
> There are some other options that I'm largely unfamiliar with out there,
> but right now it seems that Slony is the way to go with Pg.
...and Skytools (as used by Skype, I believe, which is now Open Source),
which is far simpler to use and in my experience far more reliable.
Cheers
Henry
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marco Bizzarri | 2008-09-01 07:57:08 | Re: warning: libssl.so.4, needed by |
Previous Message | Henry | 2008-09-01 07:42:58 | Re: Oracle and Postgresql |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Kellerer | 2008-09-01 08:31:25 | Re: Oracle and Postgresql |
Previous Message | Henry | 2008-09-01 07:42:58 | Re: Oracle and Postgresql |