| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Frank Heikens <f(dot)heikens(at)anva(dot)nl>, "pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #5606: DEFERRABLE and DEFERRABLE INITIALLY DEFERRED are the same |
| Date: | 2010-08-06 18:48:11 |
| Message-ID: | 8216.1281120491@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On 6 August 2010 16:25, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> I edited that wiki section, see what you think.
> Yes, that's much better. I didn't read this page until just now.
> I did, however, read the release notes, and I didn't spot a similar error there:
> """
> This allows UPDATE tab SET col = col + 1 to work on columns that have
> a unique indexes or are marked as primary key, but DEFERRABLE
> INITIALLY DEFERRED must be used to mark the constraint as deferred.
> """
Hum, maybe that's where the wiki author's mistake came from :-(. Will fix.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-08-09 01:18:05 | Re: BUG #5586: network installation |
| Previous Message | Dean Rasheed | 2010-08-06 18:29:17 | Re: BUG #5606: DEFERRABLE and DEFERRABLE INITIALLY DEFERRED are the same |