From: | "**Rod MacNeil" <rmacneil(at)interactdirect(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Richard Neill <rn214(at)cam(dot)ac(dot)uk> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Limited Shared Buffer Problem |
Date: | 2010-01-29 18:36:12 |
Message-ID: | 81b7095b1001291036s767b6332q4825ec8d8067baeb@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Thanx, I will try out that recommendation.
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Richard Neill <rn214(at)cam(dot)ac(dot)uk> wrote:
>
>
> **Rod MacNeil wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I have a server running CentOS5 with 6gb of memory that will run postgres
>> 8.3 exclusively.
>> I would like to allocate 4gb of the memory to shared buffers for postgres.
>>
>
> It might be worth pausing at this point:
>
> The various postgresql tuning guides usually suggest that on a dedicated
> system, you should give postgres about 1/4 of the RAM for shared buffers,
> while telling it that the effective_cache_size = 1/2 RAM.
>
> Postgres will make good use of the OS cache as a file-cache - the
> "effective_cache_size" setting is advisory to postgres that it can expect
> about this much data to be in RAM.
>
> Also, If you are setting up a new system, it's probably worth going for
> 8.4.2. Postgres is relatively easy to build from source.
>
> HTH,
>
> Richard
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
>
--
Rod MacNeil
Senior Software Engineer
Interact Direct Marketing, Inc.
www.interactdirect.com
rmacneil(at)interactdirect(dot)com
Primary Phone Mississauga Ontario: 905-278-4086
Alternate Phone London Ontario: 519-438-6245, Ext 183
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Stark | 2010-01-29 18:56:23 | Re: Faster CREATE DATABASE by delaying fsync (was 8.4.1 ubuntu karmic slow createdb) |
Previous Message | Ing . Marcos Luís Ortíz Valmaseda | 2010-01-29 18:24:12 | Re: Limited Shared Buffer Problem |