Re: In memory Database for postgres

From: Blazej <bl(dot)oleszkiewicz(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Scott Marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: avin_friends(at)yahoo(dot)com, "postgresql Forums" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: In memory Database for postgres
Date: 2008-11-17 23:31:50
Message-ID: 819df3760811171531p5b8870c4m261b9c84cdf134de@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

2008/11/18 Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 3:02 PM, Blazej <bl(dot)oleszkiewicz(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> In my opinion very nice solution is building part of PostgreSQL
>> database in memory - below it is instruction how to build PostgreSQL
>> schema in memory in Linux. I tested this with my ROLAP solution for
>> recalculation MOLAP cubes in memory and then join with master cube
>> (this speeds up proces about 10 times!!! - but in other solution may
>> be different).
>
> Just wondering if you compared it to how fast it runs if you've got
> lots of shared_buffers and everything fits into memory. That would be
> an interesting comparison.
>

They are two small thing becouse I do this how I have described above:
(1) shared_buffers is SHARED;
(2) I needed extremaly speed up so if table stored in hdd it must be
sync (sooner or later - even if sync is off), so this operation is
very slowly on hdd when it compares to ram_disk.

Regards,
Blazej

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Craig Ringer 2008-11-18 00:27:27 Re: Res: Res: Archive files growth!!!
Previous Message Greg Smith 2008-11-17 23:26:48 Re: In memory Database for postgres