From: | "Chad Wagner" <chad(dot)wagner(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Magnus Hagander" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
Cc: | "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Wikipedia on Postgres (was Re: postgresql vs mysql) |
Date: | 2007-02-25 15:51:32 |
Message-ID: | 81961ff50702250751w6c3dd5e2p59ea83000a89cca5@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 2/25/07, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>
> > For the record, anyone using wikipgedia deserves the pain they
> > get: it is deprecated. The latest version of MediaWiki itself is what
> > should now be used: it will detect if you have Postgres upon
> > installation. :)
>
> Perhaps the project should be *gasp* deleted then? ;-) Or is there
> actual historical information there that someone would be interested in?
>
As I said in my other mail, some folks are still using PHP4 -- which is why
MediaWiki still maintains the 1.6 branch. I am more than willing to
contribute the most recent 1.6.10 codebase w/ PostgreSQL modifications to
the foundry. I am actively maintaining my own codebase for my site.
I agree with Greg, if you are already using PHP5 then use the MediaWiki
distribution, but if your stuck on PHP4 like me then you really don't have a
choice other than what is being offered on pgfoundry. :)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alain Roger | 2007-02-25 15:57:04 | Best way to store and retrieve photo from PostGreSQL |
Previous Message | Chad Wagner | 2007-02-25 15:48:46 | Re: Wikipedia on Postgres (was Re: postgresql vs mysql) |