| From: | "Chad Wagner" <chad(dot)wagner(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Belinda M(dot) Giardine" <giardine(at)bio(dot)cse(dot)psu(dot)edu>, "Erik Jones" <erik(at)myemma(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: date comparisons |
| Date: | 2007-02-04 00:01:40 |
| Message-ID: | 81961ff50702031601q22d54852o917c982eec94d4c4@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-patches |
On 2/3/07, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>
>
> Would someone please confirm that our behavior in the three queries
> below matches Oracle's behavior?
Here is output from Oracle:
Connected to:
Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.2.0 - Production
With the Partitioning, OLAP and Data Mining options
SQL> alter session set nls_timestamp_format = 'YYYY-MM-DD HH.MI.SSXFF AM';
Session altered.
SQL> select to_timestamp('January 2006', 'Month YYYY') from dual;
TO_TIMESTAMP('JANUARY2006','MONTHYYYY')
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2006-01-01 12.00.00.000000000 AM
SQL> select to_timestamp('January 2006', 'Month YYYY') from dual;
TO_TIMESTAMP('JANUARY2006','MONTHYYYY')
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2006-01-01 12.00.00.000000000 AM
SQL> select to_timestamp('January 2006', 'FMMonth YYYY') from dual;
TO_TIMESTAMP('JANUARY2006','FMMONTHYYYY')
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2006-01-01 12.00.00.000000000 AM
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-02-04 00:03:44 | Re: date comparisons |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-02-03 23:46:56 | Re: date comparisons |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-02-04 00:03:44 | Re: date comparisons |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-02-04 00:01:00 | Re: Index split WAL reduction |