Re: Prepared transactions vs novice DBAs, again

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Prepared transactions vs novice DBAs, again
Date: 2009-04-22 18:30:36
Message-ID: 8192.1240425036@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> I think we should change the way we test it. Could we simply make
> max_prepared_transactions = 0 the default, but put
> "max_prepared_transactions = 5" into the config file in "make check"?

That only works for make check, not make installcheck. We'd really have
to complicate the GUC setup somehow to have this work, eg add a separate
enable_prepared_transactions bool that can be changed without restart.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-04-22 18:35:22 Re: trouble with to_char('L')
Previous Message Greg Sabino Mullane 2009-04-22 18:28:45 Re: Prepared transactions vs novice DBAs, again