| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Gavin Sherry <swm(at)alcove(dot)com(dot)au>, Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)myrealbox(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, PostgreSQL WWW Mailing List <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: font size |
| Date: | 2005-01-15 09:39:27 |
| Message-ID: | 8136.1105781967@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Gavin Sherry wrote:
>> I think we leave the font as it is. I run at a high screen
>> resolution. The font *would* be a problem if we didn't have the text
>> size toggle on top of all pages.
> The toggle is not on top of all pages, for example the documentation
> pages. And more importantly, it doesn't work for everyone.
The really fundamental question is: what the heck are we doing
overriding the viewer's preference for font size in the first place?
I don't claim to be a web site designer, but this sure goes against
what I understand to be good practice.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Glaesemann | 2005-01-15 09:42:51 | Re: font size |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2005-01-15 09:31:38 | Re: font size |