Re: LVM snapshots

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Matt <matt(at)ymogen(dot)net>
Cc: Murthy Kambhampaty <murthy(dot)kambhampaty(at)goeci(dot)com>, "'Peter Eisentraut'" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: LVM snapshots
Date: 2003-04-04 18:29:00
Message-ID: 8121.1049480940@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

Matt <matt(at)ymogen(dot)net> writes:
> Anyway, I was about to respond to Tom's comment that it looked like a
> snapshotting bug, but can we take it from yr subsequent post Tom that
> you no longer think so?

Right, assuming that what Murthy is seeing matches the behavior I
described (ie, no more than a few zeroed pages, all near the ends of
tables that were undergoing extension).

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Murthy Kambhampaty 2003-04-04 22:32:08 Re: LVM snapshots
Previous Message Matt 2003-04-04 18:27:16 Re: LVM snapshots