Re: Postgresql performance and tuning questions

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: lst_hoe01(at)kwsoft(dot)de
Cc: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Postgresql performance and tuning questions
Date: 2006-02-12 00:45:57
Message-ID: 812.1139705157@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

lst_hoe01(at)kwsoft(dot)de writes:
> Zitat von Scott Marlowe <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com>:
>> But you're not running the least buggy version of the 7.4 branch. The
>> 7.4 branch is up to 7.4.9. If you are runing 7.4.2 then you haven't
>> installed all the updates supplied by Suse for their distribution (or
>> Suse backports bug fixes from 7.4.9 to 7.4.2, which I kinda doubt) which
>> means you likely haven't upgraded ANY of the packages that came with it,
>> which means your system, if it is put on the internet, will likely be
>> hacked within days, if not hours.

> SuSE always only do backports of fixes and never increase the version
> number. They only appended a self made "build" number which increases.
> So it is really possible that all the fixes are in while the version
> stays the same.

Considering that we only put bug fixes into stable branches, SuSE is not
doing anyone any favors by applying such a policy (if indeed that's what
they are doing). They're just making more work for themselves, as well
as making it harder for users to tell what's fixed or not fixed.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chris Browne 2006-02-12 01:57:47 Re: How to VACUUM this table? "998994633 estimated total rows"
Previous Message Jim C. Nasby 2006-02-12 00:10:41 Re: Writing to a flat file using procedures