Re: calling function from rule

From: "Tambet Matiisen" <t(dot)matiisen(at)aprote(dot)ee>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: calling function from rule
Date: 2003-01-23 15:55:39
Message-ID: 81132473206F3A46A72BD6116E1A06AE1B14CC@black.aprote.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql


>
> "Tambet Matiisen" <t(dot)matiisen(at)aprote(dot)ee> writes:
> > I have a view and update rule on it, which updates another
> table. Now I would like to call a function, after update of
> the table is done. Also the function must be called in the
> same transaction as update. I tried to define an additional
> update rule on the view, but doing a SELECT in update rule
> spoils the affected records count:
>
> Try 7.3, we changed the rules about returned records count.
> http://www.ca.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/7.3/postgres/ru
> les-status.html
>

I have 7.3. When rule and action are the same, everything works fine.
Doing an insert in update rule and opposite are OK too. Problem is,
when I do select in insert/update/delete rule. Then the result of
select is returned instead of command status, even if the select
is done in non-instead rule and there is unconditional instead rule.
See the example in my previous mail.

Tambet

Responses

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephan Szabo 2003-01-23 16:53:53 Re: To use a VIEW or not to use a View.....
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-01-23 15:30:00 Re: calling function from rule