From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Aidan Van Dyk" <aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca>, "Jeremy Drake" <pgsql(at)jdrake(dot)com>, "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "PostgreSQL Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: modules |
Date: | 2008-04-04 20:50:34 |
Message-ID: | 8101.1207342234@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> I would suggest a guc for the "safe" place and I would suggest it be a list of
> places. And I would suggest that for OS packagers they really want two
> locations on that list, something like:
> /usr/lib/postgresql/modules;/usr/local/lib/postgresql/modules
> That way users can compile and install their own modules into /usr/local
> without interfering with modules which come from OS packages.
That seems like a great way to persuade people that "safe" isn't
so safe after all. If I were the kind of ISP that doesn't want
people to have database superuser, there's no way on earth that
I'd accept a setting like that.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Terry Lee Tucker | 2008-04-04 20:51:08 | Re: Conversion to 8.3 |
Previous Message | Terry Lee Tucker | 2008-04-04 20:39:51 | Re: Conversion to 8.3 |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-04-04 20:58:14 | Re: Garbage pad bytes within datums are bad news |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-04-04 20:27:43 | Re: modules |