From: | Tomas Berndtsson <tomas(at)nocrew(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Doug McNaught <doug(at)mcnaught(dot)org> |
Cc: | Lee Kindness <lkindness(at)csl(dot)co(dot)uk>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: big text field -> message type 0x44 |
Date: | 2002-12-05 16:23:55 |
Message-ID: | 80lm34bfj8.fsf@junk.nocrew.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Doug McNaught <doug(at)mcnaught(dot)org> writes:
> Lee Kindness <lkindness(at)csl(dot)co(dot)uk> writes:
>
> > Tom Lane writes:
> > > Okay, so it seems -D_REENTRANT is the appropriate fix.
> > >
> > > We could either add that to the template/solaris file, or just add a
> > > note to FAQ_Solaris advising that it be added to the configure switches
> > > if people intend to use libpq in threaded programs. Is there any
> > > cost or downside to just adding it always in template/solaris?
> >
> > However, _REENTRANT is not a Solarisism... On all (recent) UNIX
> > systems it toggles on correct handling for thread specific instances
> > of historically global variables (eg errno). It should be considered
> > for all platforms if libpq is intended to be used from threaded
> > programs.
>
> I know libpq is "officially" non-threadsafe, but is there anything in
> there that would actually cause a problem, assuming either a
> connection per thread or proper locking on the application's part?
> Most of the data in the library seems to be per-connection...
The documentation states:
"libpq is thread-safe as of PostgreSQL 7.0, so long as no two threads
attempt to manipulate the same PGconn object at the same time."
Tomas
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dan Langille | 2002-12-05 16:24:36 | Re: 7.4 - TODO : alter table drop foreign key |
Previous Message | Tomas Berndtsson | 2002-12-05 16:22:18 | Re: big text field -> message type 0x44 |