Re: big text field -> message type 0x44

From: Tomas Berndtsson <tomas(at)nocrew(dot)org>
To: Doug McNaught <doug(at)mcnaught(dot)org>
Cc: Lee Kindness <lkindness(at)csl(dot)co(dot)uk>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: big text field -> message type 0x44
Date: 2002-12-05 16:23:55
Message-ID: 80lm34bfj8.fsf@junk.nocrew.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Doug McNaught <doug(at)mcnaught(dot)org> writes:

> Lee Kindness <lkindness(at)csl(dot)co(dot)uk> writes:
>
> > Tom Lane writes:
> > > Okay, so it seems -D_REENTRANT is the appropriate fix.
> > >
> > > We could either add that to the template/solaris file, or just add a
> > > note to FAQ_Solaris advising that it be added to the configure switches
> > > if people intend to use libpq in threaded programs. Is there any
> > > cost or downside to just adding it always in template/solaris?
> >
> > However, _REENTRANT is not a Solarisism... On all (recent) UNIX
> > systems it toggles on correct handling for thread specific instances
> > of historically global variables (eg errno). It should be considered
> > for all platforms if libpq is intended to be used from threaded
> > programs.
>
> I know libpq is "officially" non-threadsafe, but is there anything in
> there that would actually cause a problem, assuming either a
> connection per thread or proper locking on the application's part?
> Most of the data in the library seems to be per-connection...

The documentation states:

"libpq is thread-safe as of PostgreSQL 7.0, so long as no two threads
attempt to manipulate the same PGconn object at the same time."

Tomas

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dan Langille 2002-12-05 16:24:36 Re: 7.4 - TODO : alter table drop foreign key
Previous Message Tomas Berndtsson 2002-12-05 16:22:18 Re: big text field -> message type 0x44