From: | Tomas Berndtsson <tomas(at)nocrew(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Alex Pilosov <alex(at)pilosoft(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: timestamp to int |
Date: | 2001-07-01 08:24:57 |
Message-ID: | 80g0chys2u.fsf@junk.nocrew.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Alex Pilosov <alex(at)pilosoft(dot)com> writes:
> On 30 Jun 2001, Tomas Berndtsson wrote:
>
> > > certainly not date_part or to_char or to_date. they're not
> > > mentioned in the docs, either, so don't bother looking.
> > > (think of the time you'll save.)
> > >
> > > in particular, on my debian system, you wouldn't look in
> > > /usr/share/doc/postgresql-doc/html/postgres/postgres.htm
> > > and you wouldn't do
> > >
> > > cd /usr/share/doc/postgresql-doc/html/postgres
> > > grep -i epoch *
> > >
> > > that would be bad.
> >
> > I sense a touch of sarcasm. Yet, having looked (yes, before I mailed,
> > and now again after), I still can't find a way to create a timestamp
> > from an integer. You may call me stupid, but I'd be glad to see how
> > it's done.
> Quite strangely, there's no argument for to_date to do conversion from
> 'seconds since epoch'. At any case, this is how you do it:
>
> select 'epoch'::timestamp + (x || ' seconds')::interval
Thank you. That wasn't too obvious to me, but quite logical when
seeing it now.
Tomas
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Trond Eivind =?iso-8859-1?q?Glomsr=F8d?= | 2001-07-01 14:19:03 | Re: A small question about Red Hat |
Previous Message | John Clark Naldoza y Lopez | 2001-07-01 06:42:27 | Re: A small question about Red Hat |