Re: PG10 transition tables, wCTEs and multiple operations on the same table

From: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PG10 transition tables, wCTEs and multiple operations on the same table
Date: 2017-06-08 17:48:31
Message-ID: 80ad7b4e-225b-903d-9ab6-9dd1d697ffbb@iki.fi
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 06/08/2017 08:36 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> I freely admit I encouraged you to commit this. I did not imagine
> that would be followed immediately by abdicating all responsibility
> for it. My mistake, I guess.

Robert, chill out. Kevin offered to revert. It's perhaps not the best
way forward - I'm not familiar with the details here - but it's
certainly one way to take responsibility.

- Heikki

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2017-06-08 17:50:57 Re: PostgreSQL 10 changes in exclusion constraints - did something change? CASE WHEN behavior oddity
Previous Message Robert Haas 2017-06-08 17:36:41 Re: PG10 transition tables, wCTEs and multiple operations on the same table