Re: File descriptors in exec'd subprocesses

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: File descriptors in exec'd subprocesses
Date: 2023-02-05 14:29:33
Message-ID: 80F34401-2D20-4B52-8FF7-B9E4B56904B4@anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

Unsurprisingly I'm in favor of this.

On February 5, 2023 1:00:50 AM GMT+01:00, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>Are there any more descriptors we need to think about?

Postmaster's listen sockets? Saves a bunch of syscalls, at least. Logging collector pipe write end, in backends?

Greetings,

Andres

--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2023-02-05 14:50:50 Re: [PATCH] Compression dictionaries for JSONB
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2023-02-05 14:29:08 Re: run pgindent on a regular basis / scripted manner