From: | Dustin Sallings <dustin(at)spy(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, David Garamond <lists(at)zara(dot)6(dot)isreserved(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: subversion vs cvs (Was: Re: linked list rewrite) |
Date: | 2004-03-25 20:03:36 |
Message-ID: | 808AC9F0-7E97-11D8-9C78-000393CFE6B8@spy.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Mar 25, 2004, at 1:21, Neil Conway wrote:
> I think the lack of good Win32 support (unless rectified before the
> release of 7.5) is a pretty major problem with Arch -- that alone
> might be sufficient to prevent us from adopting it.
I don't do Windows, but my understanding is that tla is as well
supported on Windows as postgres is.
The design is fundamentally easy enough that a Windows user who cares
could probably make a more suitable port for Windows than the UNIX guys
are interested in making. I've seen such discussions on the list.
--
Dustin Sallings
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dustin Sallings | 2004-03-25 20:05:19 | Re: subversion vs cvs (Was: Re: linked list rewrite) |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-03-25 20:00:01 | Re: Solaris ecpg program doesn't work - pulling my hair out! |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dustin Sallings | 2004-03-25 20:05:19 | Re: subversion vs cvs (Was: Re: linked list rewrite) |
Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2004-03-25 19:32:05 | Re: Nested transaction proposal - take N (N > 2) |