Re: subversion vs cvs (Was: Re: linked list rewrite)

From: Dustin Sallings <dustin(at)spy(dot)net>
To: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
Cc: "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, David Garamond <lists(at)zara(dot)6(dot)isreserved(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: subversion vs cvs (Was: Re: linked list rewrite)
Date: 2004-03-25 20:03:36
Message-ID: 808AC9F0-7E97-11D8-9C78-000393CFE6B8@spy.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers


On Mar 25, 2004, at 1:21, Neil Conway wrote:

> I think the lack of good Win32 support (unless rectified before the
> release of 7.5) is a pretty major problem with Arch -- that alone
> might be sufficient to prevent us from adopting it.

I don't do Windows, but my understanding is that tla is as well
supported on Windows as postgres is.

The design is fundamentally easy enough that a Windows user who cares
could probably make a more suitable port for Windows than the UNIX guys
are interested in making. I've seen such discussions on the list.

--
Dustin Sallings

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dustin Sallings 2004-03-25 20:05:19 Re: subversion vs cvs (Was: Re: linked list rewrite)
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2004-03-25 20:00:01 Re: Solaris ecpg program doesn't work - pulling my hair out!

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dustin Sallings 2004-03-25 20:05:19 Re: subversion vs cvs (Was: Re: linked list rewrite)
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2004-03-25 19:32:05 Re: Nested transaction proposal - take N (N > 2)