Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> writes:
> On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 8:42 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> Another option to use "unsigned int", on the assumption that UINT_MAX >=
>>> INT_MAX * 2 + 1.
>> Ah, that seems like a fine idea.
> Works for me.
I'll go make it so, unless Heikki's already on it?
regards, tom lane