Re: Proposal: new large object API

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Proposal: new large object API
Date: 2008-03-20 14:24:35
Message-ID: 8072.1206023075@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> It seems I forgot about the serer side lo_import. Included are the
> patches to add new form of lo_import which accepts the large object id
> as the second argument.

> Comments, objection?

Breaking the type_sanity test is not acceptable. Put in a second C
function.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tatsuo Ishii 2008-03-20 14:32:53 Re: Proposal: new large object API
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-03-20 14:06:06 Re: Problem identifying constraints which should not be inherited

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tatsuo Ishii 2008-03-20 14:32:53 Re: Proposal: new large object API
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2008-03-20 14:07:43 Re: Moving snapshot code around