Re: Order changes in PG16 since ICU introduction

From: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Verite <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Order changes in PG16 since ICU introduction
Date: 2023-06-15 05:07:13
Message-ID: 806d4a6a68e45eb6970b91e69f4b31878d96ba4b.camel@j-davis.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 2023-06-12 at 23:04 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> I object to adding a new provider for PG16 (patch 0001).

Added to July CF for 17.

> > 2. Patch 0004 is possibly out of scope for 16

> Also clearly a new feature.

Added to July CF for 17.

Regards,
Jeff Davis

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2023-06-15 05:22:49 Re: Bypassing shared_buffers
Previous Message Jeff Davis 2023-06-15 04:59:40 Re: pgsql: Fix search_path to a safe value during maintenance operations.