| From: | Ron <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: vacuum vs vacuum full |
| Date: | 2020-11-18 09:44:59 |
| Message-ID: | 80603b4e-058c-fd9e-8e8c-50010dc32572@gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 11/18/20 3:41 AM, Olivier Gautherot wrote:
> Hi Atul,
>
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 9:33 AM Atul Kumar <akumar14871(at)gmail(dot)com
> <mailto:akumar14871(at)gmail(dot)com>> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> We have a table of 3113GB, and we are planning to vacuum it in non
> business hours i.e. 12AM to 4AM, So my queries are:
>
[snip]
>
> 3. Will the operation be completed in the given time frame? how to
> check the same.
>
>
> Given the size of the table, it will probably take several days.
No matter how long it takes, this is an excellent argument for partitioning
Very Large Tables: many maintenance tasks are made *much* easier.
--
Angular momentum makes the world go 'round.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hemil Ruparel | 2020-11-18 09:57:01 | Re: Postgresql13-devel fails to install on centos 7 |
| Previous Message | Olivier Gautherot | 2020-11-18 09:41:37 | Re: vacuum vs vacuum full |