Re: Department of Redundancy Department: makeNode(FuncCall) division

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Cc: Jeevan Chalke <jeevan(dot)chalke(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Department of Redundancy Department: makeNode(FuncCall) division
Date: 2013-06-28 14:31:16
Message-ID: 8057.1372429876@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> writes:
> Please find attached the latest patch.

I remain of the opinion that this is simply a bad idea. It is unlike
our habits for constructing other types of nodes, and makes it harder
not easier to find all the places that need to be updated when adding
another field to FuncCall.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2013-06-28 14:38:08 Re: Department of Redundancy Department: makeNode(FuncCall) division
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2013-06-28 14:26:14 Re: changeset generation v5-01 - Patches & git tree