From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Uwe Maiwald <u(dot)maiwald(at)kiss-net(dot)de> |
Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: large database versus many databases |
Date: | 2005-03-18 16:07:14 |
Message-ID: | 8047.1111162034@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Uwe Maiwald <u(dot)maiwald(at)kiss-net(dot)de> writes:
> we are currently planning a very large installation of a web-application
> using PostgreSQL. The application can be configured to handle 1 database
> per customer, or all customers in one large database.
> We plan to start with e.g. 500 customers, each of which can have 200 MB or
> more in the database. And we want the system to be expandable as needed
> (thousands of customers, using lots of memory).
The one-big-database approach would scale better, but is performance
your only consideration? Separate databases would enforce strict
separation between customers, which might be either a good thing or
a bad thing depending on your needs.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Sabio - PSQL | 2005-03-18 16:16:45 | Re: large database versus many databases |
Previous Message | Uwe Maiwald | 2005-03-18 14:27:28 | large database versus many databases |