From: | Paul Silveira <plabrh1(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | which schema to install contrib modules |
Date: | 2006-12-22 14:53:40 |
Message-ID: | 8024340.post@talk.nabble.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hello,
I was wonding what the community's opinion was on which schema the contrib
modules should be installed into. I intend on using DBLink, tsearch2, and
xml2 and have initially installed them in the public schema. That will work
but it really clutters that schema and I was also intending on using that
for my application as well. Is there any value to creating a "contrib"
schema and installing them there and then just referencing them via the
contrib.<FUNCTION> convention? I was also thinking that I could just change
my postgresql.conf file to have my schema order read $user, public, contrib.
Is it more valuable to just move my application into it's own schema and
leaving the contribs in the public schema?
Thoughts?
Paul
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/which-schema-to-install-contrib-modules-tf2870947.html#a8024340
Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Paul Silveira | 2006-12-22 16:07:26 | Re: xml2 install problem |
Previous Message | Tim Tassonis | 2006-12-22 14:52:34 | Re: Tricky join question |