Re: move to usenet?

From: David W Noon <dwnoon(at)spamtrap(dot)ntlworld(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: move to usenet?
Date: 2003-08-21 11:21:42
Message-ID: 7jme11-0m2.ln1@my-pc.ntlworld.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wednesday 20 Aug 2003 22:58 in <3F43EEEB(dot)5010304(at)fireserve(dot)net>, Dennis
Gearon (gearond(at)fireserve(dot)net) wrote:

> I prefer NOT to have to scroll down to the bottom of an email anyway. I
> think discussion list emails like ours need to be like your medical
> records, the most important, recent stuff is at the top.

This approach puts answers out of the context of their related questions.

Virtually all Usenet newsgroups and private mailing lists are Q&A style
technical support forums. They are not at all like medical records, which
are mostly logs of empirical data. Consequently, the "medical records"
analogy is really a poor one for a context like the one in which this
meta-discussion is occurring.

Instead, the person replying to a message should trim that message down to
the specific parts to which the follow-up will pertain, and then place each
answer immediately after the question or observation to which it is
replying.

This has been the Usenet convention for over 15 years [and a Fidonet
convention even before that].

> I'm not exactly sure what full quoting is.

Full-quoting is the retention of those parts of a message to which the
follow-up message is not replying. See my follow-up to David Olbersen's
message for an explanation of why this is poor practice.
--
Regards,

Dave [RLU#314465]
======================================================
dwnoon(at)spamtrap(dot)ntlworld(dot)com (David W Noon)
Remove spam trap to reply via e-mail.
======================================================

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Van den Brandt 2003-08-21 11:50:44 Re: Books for PostgreSQL?
Previous Message David W Noon 2003-08-21 11:08:33 Re: move to usenet?