Re: bug in update tuple routing with foreign partitions

From: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: bug in update tuple routing with foreign partitions
Date: 2019-04-19 04:17:22
Message-ID: 7fbcb3fd-196f-c623-a0ca-843b2eb20cf0@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2019/04/19 13:00, Amit Langote wrote:
> BTW, do you think we should update the docs regarding the newly
> established limitation of row movement involving foreign tables?

Ah, maybe not, because it's a postgres_fdw limitation, not of the core
tuple routing feature. OTOH, we don't mention at all in postgres-fdw.sgml
that postgres_fdw supports tuple routing. Maybe we should and list this
limitation or would it be too much burden to maintain?

Thanks,
Amit

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrey Lepikhov 2019-04-19 04:35:44 Do CustomScan as not projection capable node
Previous Message Tom Lane 2019-04-19 04:02:48 Re: Race conditions with checkpointer and shutdown