From: | hrbek at plz(dot)comstar(dot)cz (Ing(dot) Filip Hrbek) |
---|---|
To: | |
Subject: | [Pljava-dev] Re: PL Java Security (sqlj / owner postgres) |
Date: | 2005-02-06 16:18:44 |
Message-ID: | 7f8505697a91bdeed3b0889c17f2000e@cnet.pha.comstar.cz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pljava-dev |
<BR>> Filip,
<BR>> > SQLJ Schema security:
<BR>> > -----------------------------------
<BR>> > The SQLJ schema is authorized to user
postgres.
<BR>> >
<BR>> Why? In my installation, I don\'t have a
postgres user. Is \"postgres\" a
<BR>> non-superuser in your setup?
<BR>
<BR>Yes, you are right. There is no reason to have
a \"postgres\" user. I am just used to have it as
a default (and the only) superuser.
<BR>
<BR>I wrote the \"checkIfConnectedAsSuperuser\"
method in the source (I can see it already in CVS
:-), this check should be sufficient. The SQLJ
schema and its object can be owned by another
supersuser who is deploying pl/Java, not only by
the default \"postgres\" user. The only important
thing is that the SQLJ objects owner has the
superuser flag \"on\".
<BR>
<BR>Regards, Filip
<BR>
<BR>>
<BR>> Regards,
<BR>> Thomas Hallgren
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.pgfoundry.org/pipermail/pljava-dev/attachments/20050206/44358107/attachment.html>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Hallgren | 2005-02-06 18:34:17 | [Pljava-dev] Re: PL Java Security (sqlj / owner postgres) |
Previous Message | Thomas Hallgren | 2005-02-06 11:11:14 | [Pljava-dev] Re: PL Java Security |