From: | Ian Barwick <ian(dot)barwick(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
Cc: | Sergei Kornilov <sk(at)zsrv(dot)org>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] minor bugfix for pg_basebackup (9.6 ~ ) |
Date: | 2019-08-01 02:37:21 |
Message-ID: | 7e92c294-f8fd-bd83-447d-8839c96fb9ea@2ndquadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 7/27/19 6:52 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2019-Jul-25, Michael Paquier wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 11:23:30AM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>>> Heh, yesterday I revised the original patch as attached and was about to
>>> push when the bell rang. I like this one because it keeps the comment
>>> to one line and it mentions the function name in charge of the
>>> validation (useful for grepping later on). It's a bit laconic because
>>> of the long function name and the desire to keep it to one line, but it
>>> seems sufficient to me.
>>
>> Looks fine to me. A nit: addition of braces for the if block. Even
>> if that a one-liner, there is a comment so I think that this makes the
>> code more readable.
>
> Yeah, I had removed those on purpose, but that was probably inconsistent
> with my own reviews of others' patches. I pushed it with them.
Thanks
Regards
Ian Barwick
--
Ian Barwick https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Craig Ringer | 2019-08-01 02:45:50 | Re: concerns around pg_lsn |
Previous Message | Amit Langote | 2019-08-01 01:32:44 | Re: partition routing layering in nodeModifyTable.c |