Re: logical replication - still unstable after all these months

From: Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Mark Kirkwood <mark(dot)kirkwood(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: logical replication - still unstable after all these months
Date: 2017-06-06 21:21:12
Message-ID: 7e91cc76-f94e-edbe-302b-1218ed967519@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 06/06/17 21:09, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 3:01 PM, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl> wrote:
>> Belated apologies all round for the somewhat provocative $subject; but I
>> felt at that moment that this item needed some extra attention.
>
> FWIW, it seemed like a pretty fair subject line to me given your test
> results. I think it's in everyone's interest to get this feature
> stabilized before we ship a final release - people will rely on it,
> and if it drops even one row even occasionally, it's going to be a big
> problem for our users.
>

+1, I considered the issues solved when snapshot builder issues were
fixed so it was good reminder to check again.

--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Petr Jelinek 2017-06-06 21:24:50 Re: libpqrcv_PQexec() seems to violate latch protocol
Previous Message Andres Freund 2017-06-06 21:17:00 Re: libpqrcv_PQexec() seems to violate latch protocol