From: | Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Mark Kirkwood <mark(dot)kirkwood(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: logical replication - still unstable after all these months |
Date: | 2017-06-06 21:21:12 |
Message-ID: | 7e91cc76-f94e-edbe-302b-1218ed967519@2ndquadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 06/06/17 21:09, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 3:01 PM, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl> wrote:
>> Belated apologies all round for the somewhat provocative $subject; but I
>> felt at that moment that this item needed some extra attention.
>
> FWIW, it seemed like a pretty fair subject line to me given your test
> results. I think it's in everyone's interest to get this feature
> stabilized before we ship a final release - people will rely on it,
> and if it drops even one row even occasionally, it's going to be a big
> problem for our users.
>
+1, I considered the issues solved when snapshot builder issues were
fixed so it was good reminder to check again.
--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Petr Jelinek | 2017-06-06 21:24:50 | Re: libpqrcv_PQexec() seems to violate latch protocol |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2017-06-06 21:17:00 | Re: libpqrcv_PQexec() seems to violate latch protocol |