Re: PG 10 release notes

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PG 10 release notes
Date: 2017-05-01 13:28:00
Message-ID: 7e787537-5502-d62b-217b-3c41feadda56@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 05/01/2017 05:40 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 9:56 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>> First, I don't think RFC references belong in the release notes, let
>> alone RFC links.
>
> Why not? I think RFC references are a great thing to include in the
> release notes, and including links seems helpful, too.

I could see not including RFC references in a PR but release notes seem
to be the perfect place for them.

JD

--
Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/
+1-503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2017-05-01 13:39:54 check with serial
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2017-05-01 13:22:42 Re: CTE inlining