23.12.2020 07:44, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 02:02:46PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> So, attached is a patch to make the logic more consistent that I would
>> like to apply down to 12. Please let me know if there are any
>> objections or comments.
> I have looked at that again this morning, and applied a fix down to
> 9.6 with the change in the TAP tests based on pg_resetwal. In 9.5,
> pg_strtouint64() is not available, but this branch is old enough that
> it did not seem worth the extra effort.
Thank you!
I think that with this change, if the check for epoch will be added
someday, it will work consistently too.
Best regards,
Alexander