Re: User documentation vs Official Docs

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Psql_General (E-mail)" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: User documentation vs Official Docs
Date: 2018-07-17 00:13:52
Message-ID: 7d6fe519-ab07-b3a4-3d56-6b3d38b3b0e7@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 07/16/2018 05:08 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>
> Sounds like wiki pages could solve need this pretty conveniently. If
> and when the content is mature enough and migrates to the tutorial main
> documentation pages, the wiki pages can be replaced with redirects to
> those.

Anyone who writes a lot is going to rebel against using a wiki. They are
one of the worst to write in from a productivity perspective. I would
rather write in Docbook, at least then I can template everything and we
could have a standard xsl sheet etc...

JD

>

--
Command Prompt, Inc. || http://the.postgres.company/ || @cmdpromptinc
*** A fault and talent of mine is to tell it exactly how it is. ***
PostgreSQL centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Advocate: @amplifypostgres || Learn: https://postgresconf.org
***** Unless otherwise stated, opinions are my own. *****

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ravi Krishna 2018-07-17 00:35:11 PG backup check
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2018-07-17 00:08:57 Re: User documentation vs Official Docs