Re: SSL SNI

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SSL SNI
Date: 2021-02-26 07:05:12
Message-ID: 7cf218c9-0229-d005-57a1-c4c3e7f4f3a8@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 26.02.21 03:40, Greg Stark wrote:
> This still doesn't seem like it is IPv6-ready.

Do you mean the IPv6 detection code is not correct? What is the problem?

> Is there any harm in> having SNI with an IPv6 address there if it
gets through?

I doubt it.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2021-02-26 07:12:39 Re: libpq debug log
Previous Message Amit Langote 2021-02-26 06:50:35 Re: Parallel INSERT (INTO ... SELECT ...)