Re: Logical replication

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Logical replication
Date: 2017-05-01 16:25:08
Message-ID: 7cc63cb1-f413-0efc-10ed-0535adde2eec@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 5/1/17 10:32, Adrian Klaver wrote:
> On 04/30/2017 09:07 AM, Adrian Klaver wrote:
>> I have started looking at the logical replication feature in Postgres
>> 10. One thing I have no been able to determine is the interoperability
>> between it and pglogical(www.2ndquadrant.com/en/resources/pglogical/). I
>> know the one is derived from the other, what I can not find is whether a
>> Postgres 9.4 instance with the pglogical extension installed can
>> communicate with a Postgres 10 instance using the built in code?

> Some testing says the answer is no:

correct

> If I am correct, this means from 9.4 <--> 10 and points in between you
> would need to use the pglogical extension on both ends.

correct

> Going from 10
> --> you could use the builtin logical replication. This leads to another
> question. Is is possible to use both at the same time?:
>
> 9.4 ---> 10(instance 1) ---> 10(instance 2)
> pglogical pglogical
> builtin builtin

That is possible.

pglogical will continue to exist, so you can also keep using it if you
already have it.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Adrian Klaver 2017-05-01 16:34:48 Re: Logical replication
Previous Message Melvin Davidson 2017-05-01 15:50:55 Re: GENERAL : [Can somebody explain about Base directory]