From: | Lonni J Friedman <netllama(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Vivek Khera <khera(at)kcilink(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: What HW / OS is recommeded |
Date: | 2004-12-22 17:41:37 |
Message-ID: | 7c1574a9041222094165058b37@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 12:28:22 -0500, Vivek Khera <khera(at)kcilink(dot)com> wrote:
> >>>>> "a" == alex <alex(at)meerkatsoft(dot)com> writes:
>
> a> We are currently looking at Dell / HP
> a> but the questions is
>
> a> - how many processors (2 or 4)
> a> - do we gain with 4 cpus if we probably never have a few users connected
> a> - what processors are recommended Opteron / Xeon / Itanium
> a> - how much memory ? 2GB ? 4GB ?
> a> - Disks, i guess we go with Raid5, 15k SCSI
> a> - what OS ? Suse / RHE3 / Fedora /
> a> - Disk controller ?
>
> Run, do not walk, from your Dell solution. I've never been able to
> get "expected" performance from those boxes. They seem to do
> something to the RAID controllers to make them not work as fast as one
> would expect the equivalent name-brand part (eg, LSI RAID card or
> Adaptec RAID card) and similar disk drives.
Hate to burst your bubble, but the RAID controller that Dell ships is
an Adaptec OEM. Dell just rebrands them.
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
L. Friedman netllama(at)gmail(dot)com
LlamaLand http://netllama.linux-sxs.org
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Együd Csaba (Freemail) | 2004-12-22 17:44:00 | Re: Strange Index behavior |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-12-22 17:34:15 | Re: Strange Index behavior |