From: | Lonni J Friedman <netllama(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: disabling OIDs? |
Date: | 2004-12-13 04:25:53 |
Message-ID: | 7c1574a904121220253ae4a5b2@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 22:16:27 -0500, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Lonni J Friedman <netllama(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > The spam filtering package I use (dspam) had a section in their
> > release notes recently which stated that disabling OIDs greatly
> > increased speeds, and so they suggested that people do that on their
> > tables.
>
> "greatly increased"? I doubt it.
>
> Last I heard, dspam was not noted for any large amount of cluefulness
> WRT postgres. It was only recently that we managed to talk them out of
> their most egregious bits of mysql-centricity. Going to them for
> postgres tuning tips is about like coming to me for mysql tuning ...
>
OK, thanks. So is there any real benefit in doing this in a generic
(non-dspam) sense, or is it just a hack that wouldn't be noticable?
Any risks or potential problems down the line?
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
L. Friedman netllama(at)gmail(dot)com
LlamaLand http://netllama.linux-sxs.org
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-12-13 04:33:58 | Re: using inheritance in production application. |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-12-13 03:16:27 | Re: disabling OIDs? |