Re: version number between pgdump and server

From: "Harald Armin Massa" <haraldarminmassa(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Laurent ROCHE" <laurent_roche(at)yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: version number between pgdump and server
Date: 2009-01-08 16:20:58
Message-ID: 7be3f35d0901080820k44648e06tc2e7593ee303a5f9@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Laurent,

> Will it not be more reasonable to abort only if the first two numbers
> mismatch but not the last one which is (AFAIK) only a patch number and does
> not change the features ?

it corrects bugs. Not only security vulnerabilities, but also bugs.

And it may be that there is also a fixed bug in pg_dump. So better one
warning more then one warning less,

best wishes,

Harald

--
GHUM Harald Massa
persuadere et programmare
Harald Armin Massa
Spielberger Straße 49
70435 Stuttgart
0173/9409607
no fx, no carrier pigeon
-
EuroPython 2009 will take place in Birmingham - Stay tuned!

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Harald Fuchs 2009-01-08 16:28:16 Re: selecting recs based on a tmp tbl vals that are wildcarded ?
Previous Message Christopher Swingley 2009-01-08 16:20:22 Re: to_tsquery, plainto_... avoiding bad input, injections. Is there a builtin function for this ? Escaping?