| From: | Vik Fearing <vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> |
| Cc: | Paul Ramsey <pramsey(at)cleverelephant(dot)ca>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] random_normal function |
| Date: | 2022-12-21 08:18:54 |
| Message-ID: | 7b581e46-cb47-3ea3-d318-00791fed8b1d@postgresfriends.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 12/19/22 04:36, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 17, 2022 at 05:49:15PM +0100, Fabien COELHO wrote:
>> Overall, I think that there should be a clearer discussion and plan about
>> which random functionS postgres should provide to complement the standard
>> instead of going there… randomly:-)
>
> So, what does the specification tells about seeds, normal and random
> functions?
Nothing at all.
--
Vik Fearing
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Smith | 2022-12-21 08:25:31 | Re: Force streaming every change in logical decoding |
| Previous Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2022-12-21 08:09:16 | Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum |