| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: rename pg_log directory? |
| Date: | 2017-03-01 04:51:17 |
| Message-ID: | 7b3f010b-717f-9031-a20e-5a27d137c214@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2/28/17 06:07, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> server_log seems like a better choice then I think. So +1 for that.
>
> In theory cluster_log since it's a "cluster level log", but given how
> many people already get confused by the term cluster being used that
> way, I think that while maybe technically correct, that would be a very
> bad choice.
Well, the premise was that we wanted to rename xlog because people think
that the "log" is "the log". So there should be no confusion if there
is only one "log" left. (cough, cough, clog, cough, cough) I think if
we invent nonstandard names, it will be more confusing, not less.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2017-03-01 04:58:23 | brin autosummarization -- autovacuum "work items" |
| Previous Message | Ashutosh Sharma | 2017-03-01 04:50:40 | Re: Should we cacheline align PGXACT? |